Go On

Matthew Perry, surrounded by the grievers he somehow inspires in Go On.

Go On airs on Tuesdays at 7, starting on September 11; the premiere aired after the Olympics and is probably available on NBC.com.

I don’t go into any show (or film, or what have you) expecting awfulness. Maybe sometimes if it’s an interesting failure; but otherwise, why waste time by directing pointless snark at something everyone hates? So I watched Go On with a hopeful attitude; sadly, my hopes were dashed. Whilst not an unqualified failure, Go On’s pilot is too serious to work as broad comedy and too broad to be believably serious.

Go On stars Matthew Perry as a sports radio host whose wife recently died. I saw snark directed at Perry on Twitter, but he was always Friends’ funniest cast member, even if every show he’s starred in since burned out fast. Here, his style of rapid one-liners just doesn’t work; they aren’t funny, but more importantly they undermine the series’ attempts at drama.

Perry’s character, Ryan King, joins a support group made up of stock sadsacks and oddballs. Only Julie White’s character, a woman angry over her partner’s death, stands out as someone unique. You know who really isn’t memorable? The group’s leader, played by Laura Benanti. She is there to, predictably, accomplish nothing and feud with our rebellious hero. We learn she worked with Weight Watchers and so has no credentials to lead the group; neither does Ryan, of course.

Yes, Go On tries to temper the serious, dramedic premise by being generically inspirational. Ryan enters the group and instantly makes everyone better in a way Benanti’s character can’t. Since he’s a sports anchor, he pits everyone’s source of grief against each other in what’s dubbed “March Sadness”. This moment is broad and feels false. What grieving person would not only go along with such a ghastly competition, but find it fun? Like much in Go On’s first episode, the “march sadness” competition is a broad moment that is both unfunny and has no real pathos. Yet it shakes the group out of its stupor, and later Ryan convinces them to don the medieval gear of a LARPer’s group and chase after the Google Streetview van. This is meant to be a life-affirming moment for Ryan and the group, but it’s an artificial grab at emotion. Ryan is spun as a figure who inspires those around him while moving on himself, but in practice his anger is dwelt only briefly and his time in the group consists mainly of dull quips. Go On stacks the deck in favor of admiring Ryan, but fails in execution.

I didn’t hate Go On, and it could become a good show when given time. It doesn’t help that Go On feels like a copy of Community, with Perry as Jeff, Benanti as Britta, and the support group as, well, the study group. Community’s pilot – and early episodes – weren’t promising, but it grew into one of the best shows on TV. Go On could perform the same feat; there are moments in the première that do work, like a montage in the middle of the episode that actually treats each character’s problems as something other than a target for Perry’s jokes. Honestly, I wonder if Go On’s problems are ones of format – a half hour network sitcom has to brush past any emotion in favor of jokes, and maybe it would work better as a hour-long dramedy. I’ll watch the series when it starts airing in earnest, but I fear any hopes that Go On will become a great show will remain just that – unrealized hopes.

Notes

  • Go On joins the ranks of shows that waste John Cho – a storied company including Flashforward and The Single’s Table, a sitcom starring Cho that never even aired. I can’t see Go On emphasizing the workplace elements, so I doubt his role will be too large in episodes to come.
  • Weird of NBC to air a show not after the Olympics, but after one day’s Olympics coverage. Yet they’re also having a preview for Animal Practice and an early première for Grimm.
  • NBC tried to go “broad” with their new sitcoms this season, and there’s nothing wrong with that. But going off ads, I’m questioning if they picked up a single good comedy. It’s possible to make a show that’s broad and good, but not if your schedule’s based around a shockingly well-paid monkey.

Comments are closed.